Working during high school

Introduction Many teens in high school get thrilled at the idea of working part time while still in school. The opportunity to make money is good and some parents give their children the liberty to work while still in school. For others, they would hear none of it because to them it is a complete waste of time. Whichever opinions parents may have the issue of students working throughout high school should be thought through carefully before making any decisions.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Working during high school specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Some students might find that their expectations about their prospective jobs are very different from the reality on the ground. However, if the students are open minded they will adjust well into the work place. Students should be allowed to work throughout high school to learn life skills and get a greater understanding of how the world operates once they are leg al adults. Networking Working while still in school presents students with a golden chance to start networking early in their life. The students who do part time jobs in companies get the opportunity to meet their future employers and if they become good employees while doing their stints as part time employees they will improve, their employability levels in the future because they will not be strangers in the same work places. Moreover, their former employers can offer them valuable assistance in case they need a reference from their current or former employers. The employers can also guide them in the right direction to take if they proof to be worthwhile employees. Students should also not shy away from working as volunteers in non profit organizations because such services might provide them with an opening in the future through making connections with people who might play a major role in their future careers. However, that should not be the primary goal of volunteering becaus e one should give expecting nothing in return. Learn the real world Students who work while still in high school get an opportunity to see how the real world operates and thus are better equipped than those who do not venture in the business world earlier. Working enables the students to integrate some of the things they learn theoretically in class in a real environment and makes them develop analytical skills as they deal with the challenges they encounter in their workplace. This increases their understanding, which may translate into better grades. Moreover, they gains skills that one cannot get in the classroom such as interaction with different clients or customers and thus they are equipped to deal with people from diverse backgrounds. Such students can comfortably work in any part of the world because their interactions with various people prepare them to become global citizens (Anderson Murphy, 6).Advertising Looking for essay on education? Let's see if we can help yo u! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Responsibility The opportunity to work makes students more responsible. A working student has to juggle three things that is education, work and play or leisure. Such a student must develop discipline to be able to balance the three things so that none suffers due to neglect because all are equally important. A student gets an opportunity to learn how to manage their time well and thus even in the future they will be able to handle their jobs well even if it means working extra time. Students also learn to be responsible with money because working teaches them the value of money unlike those who receive it from others and spend it without knowing its value or what it takes to earn. Make an extra coin Students get an opportunity to make some extra money and can buy stuff they admire which maybe their parents are unable to get them. Students come from diverse backgrounds in terms of economic resources. Some have adequate money a nd do not need to work at all. On the other hand, some come from disadvantaged backgrounds and must chip in to help the rest of the family and thus the opportunity to work while studying is valuable to them as it enables them to help their families or even cater for part of their school expenses. Academics may suffer Conversely, working throughout high school may affect a student’s academic performance adversely. Some students cannot cope with a work and class work and neglect one at the expense of the other. In such a scenario a student might fail in class work due to lack of concentration which might result from long working hours even though states regulate the number of hours students can work. The work schedule might conflict with the school timetable hence a students might be forced to skip some classes. Moreover, students may fail to engage in activities like sports, which require time in practice, and maybe they are good in a certain sport, which may earn them a study scholarship and give them an opportunity to further their education. Lack time for the family The working hours might eat into family time. Students may spend every free time they have including the weekends away on work and miss family activities. This is not healthy because people need to spend time together to build strong relationships. Parents who are busy at work most of the time do not get a chance to interact with their children too. Conclusion Finally, students should be allowed to work throughout high school because they get to learn a great deal about the real life. As long as a student can balance, their work and academics then they should be allowed to work. Working does students more good than harm and their parents should guide them in picking jobs that will help them in bettering their line of chosen careers. Will not only the students make an extra coin, but also learn to become responsible citizens and good members of their community in the future.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Working during high school specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Reference List Anderson, S. Murphy, N. (1999). Mandatory Community Service: Citizenship Education or Involuntary Servitude? Retrieved from ://www.ecs.org/html/Document.asp?chouseid=1426 This essay on Working during high school was written and submitted by user Mckenna Leach to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Nixons Legacy, Reaganomics

Nixons Legacy, Reaganomics How would the Watergate scandal have affected your perception of government power? The signing of the antiballistic missile treaty with Soviet Union was not a wise action for Nixon. This treaty was worse of than the unilateral disarmament, because it only restricted our ability of United States to defend itself, though the treaty was later ended by George bush. In fact, apart from this policy, the Americans believed that there were a number of other misleading policies that were put in records during the Nixon era (Niskanem, 1998).Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Nixon’s Legacy, Reaganomics specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Watergate scandal had many impacts on the American government and its people. There were a large number of convictions and much other causality that resulted from the Watergate scandal. For instance, there were alterations in campaign finance reform. The media too became more aggressive in t heir investigations and unraveling of scandals in the government (Davidson, 2006 p.23). The 25th anniversary of the Watergate scandal was realized in 1997 and it was evident that many books were published about this scandal and films too were developed on the same. The influence of Watergate scandal was also felt during the 1998/99 impeachment of bill Clinton. How do you think the influence of Watergate has contributed to reporters boldness? The Watergate scandal is currently associated to the cynical attitude that many Americans have developed towards politicians and the government. The media was influenced by the aftermath of the Watergate scandal as it gained confidence and a more aggressive approach to investigating and unraveling of scandals in the government in an attempt to facilitate transparency in governance and becoming an effective watch dog of the government. The scandal was unraveled by one of the media groups the Washington post reporters. This unveiling led to emerge nce of investigative reporter teams on news papers and television around the world. Due to the boldness of the two reporters of the Washington based newspaper; the country was able to unravel the hidden corruption scandal which could cost the nation a lot of tax payers money. Due to unraveling of this scandal, the media reports became more aggressive and bold on corruption cases and bad governance (Niskanem, 1998). Their aggressiveness is necessary for the purpose of watching government officials and reporting crooked transactions to the public. The removal of Nixon showed a series of accountability processes. Though the president was serving a fixed term in office, he was accountable to the House of Representatives (Niskanem, 1998). This house directly represents recent opinions of the public. The president can only be removed by the senate comprising of senators representing states of varied population and this would be abiding by the federal values of the founding fathers.Adverti sing Looking for essay on history? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Reagan’s economics Reaganomics were policies about the economy that were introduced and promoted by President Ronald Regan in 1980s. Reaganomics introduced policies such as policies to reduce government spending, reduce income marginal tax rates and reduce capital gains too. Reagan policies also aimed at inflation reduction, reduction on the government regulation on the economy and to regulate the supply of money. Fiscal stimulus during recessions meant to boost economic growth and was attained through increased government spending or by cutting on taxes. These strategies produce a budget deficit which in turn stimulated the economy (Rothbard, 2004). Conservatives advocate tax cuts on corporations and high income people to increase return on investment and profits. The Reagan cuts on tax were mainly in the latter category with large cuts in the top marginal rates and corporate taxes. However as Reagan continued with his policies even after the end of the recession period, the government deficit did not go away with the end of recession. Regan had huge budget deficits through out his presidency which was against the conservative policies (Rothbard, 2004). Ultimately, Reaganomics produced big political dividends for the Republicans, and it may have contributed to economic stability. References Davidson, J. (2006). Nation of nations: A concise narrative of the American republic. New York: McGraw-Hill. Niskanem, W. A. (1998) Reaganomics. Retrieved from econlib.org/library/Enc1/Reaganomics.html. Rothbard, M. N. (2004). The Myths of Reaganomics. Retrieved from https://mises.org/library/myths-reaganomics.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Nixon’s Legacy, Reaganomics specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More

Outline and assess Foucault's critique of modernity Essay - 1

Outline and assess Foucault's critique of modernity - Essay Example Finally, the third section will be devoted to Foucaultian critique of institutional basis of modernity and the disciplinary character of its rationality. It will be argued that, while Foucault denounced various aspects of modernity, he did not attempt to idealise pre-modern thought/institutions, and remained unsure about social project alternative to modernity, thus contributing to similar indecisiveness among the following post-modernist thinkers. 1. Foucault’s Archaeology of Knowledge: A Critique of Rationalist Objectivity The modern account of knowledge was premised upon the representationalist epistemology founded by Descartes. Rejecting previous assumptions on the nature and purposes of human knowledge, Descartes posited that knowledge is derived from accurate determination of correspondence of certain representations with the actual objects of external world, a correspondence that can in principle be verified by constructing certain methodological arguments (Gutting, 199 9, p. 116). Later modern thinkers basically followed this Cartesian epistemology, assuming that representations under consideration are derived from some innate properties of human mind and reality. Foucault based his epistemological critique of modern philosophy on the thorough deconstruction of Cartesian notions of knowledge. He affirms the historically specific character of knowledge, as opposed to ahistorical Cartesian account of epistemological procedures, assuming that development of structures of human knowledge is governed by alterations in episteme, i.e. ‘total set of relations that unite... the discursive practices that give rise to epistemological figures, sciences, and possibly formalised systems’ (Foucault, 2002a, p. 211). Foucault believes that the development of distinctively modern episteme was caused by shift from the Renaissance view of knowledge as system of resemblances that was predicated upon the clarification of interrelation between various objec ts of surrounding world and men’s place in it, to analytical and interpretational forms of cognition (Carrette, 2000, pp. 15-16). The latter were based not on ‘the sudden and illuminating discovery that all thought is thought’ but on ‘constantly renewed interrogation’ of ‘the forms of non-thinking’ that leads to the reduction of empirical world to some universal and transcendental dialectics (Foucault, 2002b, p. 353). Foucault surmises that universalistic assumptions of modernity’s epistemology are invalidated by the discursive and ultimately relative nature of knowledge as such, for, in his view, the structures of knowledge depend on the character of discourse as practice that brings about the very object that are spoken of (Mahon, 1992, p. 11). Here, one may find that Foucault maintains that the discursive nature of language and knowledge practices does not allow for some objective, universal discourse, and therefore that modern ity’s pretences for formulating a transparent methodology of knowledge are unfounded. 2. Foucault on Subject: The Rejection of A Priori Subjectivity The modernity’s view on subject is generally predicated upon the idea of its universality and humanist character, which means that ‘